Riverbank Strategy Group
25 seats · 24 active · pilot day 62 of 90
Where the team actually is, as of last reading. Early attrition signal moved up since the reorg announcement.
01
Trust gap
Trust Index
74/100
Narrow. What the team says and what it shows cohere across leadership and IC layers.
↑ 3 vs. baseline
03
Early attrition signal
Shadow Emergence
18%
Above watch line. Two members on the engineering team are showing the pattern that precedes resignation, since the reorg announcement.
↑ 7 vs. baseline
04
Groupthink-fracture variance
Edge Alignment
62/100
Healthy. No rubber-stamping, no fracture. Mid-band, where most high-performing teams sit.
↑ 4 vs. baseline
05
Predicted friction
Collision Forecast
2 pairs
Two interpersonal collisions about to surface. Surfaced by pattern, not by name. See below.
flat vs. baseline
06
Reflection cadence
Signal Density
3.4/wk
How often the team is checking in with itself. Steady engagement. Holds through pressure.
↑ 0.8 vs. baseline
02
Working-style mix · 24 of 25 readings
Rhythm Distribution
The shape, in one sentence
Builder-heavy, Storm-light. The team builds well and absorbs conflict slowly. A single Storm placement at director level may relieve the friction point flagged on Collision Forecast.
Predicted friction.
The interpersonal collisions about to surface in the room. The dashboard never names individuals; it surfaces the patterns leadership should watch and place hires against.
Builder × Mirror collision cross-functional review pattern
High
Flame × Keeper friction decision velocity in product
Medium
Ghost × Storm absence two members trending toward distance
Medium
The pilot, where you are.
Day 0 · Kickoff
Provisioned.
25 seats. Baseline readings captured.
Day 30 · First readout
Delivered.
Executive readout. Written summary.
Day 62 · You are here
Movement detected.
Shadow emergence climbed 7 points after the reorg announcement. Two members at risk.
Day 90 · Final reading
Executive session.
Ninety-minute sit. Full architecture handed over.
How this passes legal.
Every team member who took the assessment keeps sole access to their answers, their raw text, and their keystroke data. No one upstream, including you, reads what any individual wrote. Leadership receives only the team-level shape: working-style counts, trust gap, attrition signal, alignment variance. The room without the faces. This is a condition of the architecture, not a toggle that can be flipped.