The client below is fictional. The shape is exactly what you receive, minutes after a real client finishes the six questions. One page. No scores, no grid, no type code.
They answer fast until the question is about them, then the pace drops by half. They finish every thought they start, but they rewrote the ambition question three times and shipped the smallest version of it. Steady is the performance; the hesitation is where the work is.
Competence. When a question got close, they answered with their calendar: what they handle, who depends on them, what would fall without them. Being needed is doing a lot of load-bearing work in how they describe themselves.
Do not open with goals; they will hand you the org chart. Open with the smallest version of the ambition they almost wrote: ask what they wanted to say there and edited out. Expect steadiness first, and give the silence room to finish.
First read. When they take it again mid-engagement, this page shows what moved: the word, the pace, the places they stopped editing themselves.
Each line is tagged by how sure the read is: observed happened, working read is the best current guess, offered is a suggestion to test. After session one you mark each one landed or missed. What the read can and cannot know.
The raw answers, which stay with the client unless they explicitly hand them to you. And the engine's read of how this person could be pressured, which is never shown to anyone but the client themselves. You get the way in, not the way to move them.